Olivier,

You are right that variables are copied from the processinstance. I would have 
sworn that was only the case if it existed and if not, none was created. I'm 
almost positive of this.

I'll look in the code but if the current behaviour is as you describe, 
boolean-expression:  ((the docs have to be updated OR at least have to be more 
specific OR I have to read them again) AND there should be testcases for this) 
.... 
(I'm sure there were, but that could have been for 3.1.x, I'll check)

but what about this scenario:

I want to have the user enter a value for a variable, but if through any other 
means this variable was already set (e.g. the esb) I want to display that and 
the user should be able to change it. With the current behaviour and the way 
you have to configure that, there always is a variable either with the value 
null or the value that is already there. 

Then only putting a required=true on the input element in the webinterface 
would enforce this. In that case, I DO think there is a bug in the 
formgenerator since this is so unintuitive... I'm in favour of adding an 
additional check in the source then to see that if the current value is null 
and there is no value posted, an exception is thrown. 

Sigh......

View the original post : 
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4084098#4084098

Reply to the post : 
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4084098
_______________________________________________
jboss-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user

Reply via email to