>From experience/reading the forum I would say that IceFaces doesn't inegrate >terribly well with other component suites (but discuss this on the Icefaces >forum as well), RichFaces should (e.g. we have a Seam/Trinidad/Richfaces >example) - IMO this depends on how well the component suite is written. Any >issues with RichFaces interacting with other frameworks should be given high >priority (assuming it is fixable from the RF end). GWT is another kettle of >fish (and a bit orthogonal to JSF) - check out the GWT remoting example for >one way to go about using it, and Rob Jellinghaus' work (not in Seam atm) on >Seam/gwt4jsf for another way. In general JSF works better than GWT with Seam, >as that is where Seam is most used ;)
1) I'm not sure about RF/IceFaces, but RF/GWT should be fine. Most frameworks have filters which can interfere with one another. 2) Seam/JSF shouldn't have any navigation problems with different view techs. Post your problems back here/RF forum and they should be looked at. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4084781#4084781 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4084781 _______________________________________________ jboss-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user
