"jhalliday" wrote : huh? I thought the whole point of MC was that you could use 
POJOs. Now it appears I have to implement or subclass something? Arggg. How 
does that leave me any better off than not changing my code at all. I may as 
well stick with 'extends ServiceMBeanSupport'
  | 
Define TM as MC bean, not as mbean, and you're done. ;-)
Why the mbean XML?

View the original post : 
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4109099#4109099

Reply to the post : 
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4109099
_______________________________________________
jboss-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user

Reply via email to