Hi,
You are probably right that the jBoss+Tomcat package is better tested... But as you
said yourself Jetty is faster, and in our two
setups (the two jBoss2.2.0 packages) it is so much faster that tomcat is'nt even to be
considered.
I guess that what im trying to say is that if you want a jBoss+servlet container
setup, just for trying out jBoss, or perhaps use
for a small app, then Tomcat is ok, but when the music starts playing... Jetty is the
solution!
...anyways this is just our experience with the two, I could of course be totally
wrong :-)
^terp
> -----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
> Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Pa vegne af danch
> Sendt: 20. april 2001 08:51
> Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Emne: Re: [JBoss-user] Jetty vs. Tomcat
>
>
> Alternatively, Tomcat is the reference implementation. Jetty is
> lightweight and fast.
>
> The only other thing is that (judging from traffic analysis of these
> mailing lists) Integration of Tomcat with JBoss is better tested. (Jetty
> users, feel free to argue)
>
> -danch
>
> Alvin Yap wrote:
>
> > Tomcat is more robust and extensible. Jetty is lightweight and fast.
> >
> > Alvin
> >
> > Jason Dillon wrote:
> >
> >
> >> Does anyone have any opinions as to which contain is more robust, easier to
> >> use and such?
> >>
> >> --jason
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> JBoss-user mailing list
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > JBoss-user mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> JBoss-user mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
>
_______________________________________________
JBoss-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
