Hey,
> permission java.net.SocketPermission "192.168.1.100:*",
> "connect,resolve";
>
Consult this: http://www.jboss.org/documentation/HTML/ch10s03.html
try with "192.168.1.100:1024-", meaning all ports higher than 1024, I
think you have actual port syntax in javadocs...
> Is there a better way of allocating this permission rather than opening up
> all ports? I started with just 1099, but then immediately hit the
> restriction on the port created for communication.
>
> But my current sticking point is the next error I hit:
>
> Exception caught: java.security.AccessControlException: access denied
> (java.io.FilePermission \H:\JBoss-2.2.1\tmp\deploy\Default\DbTester.jar\-
> read)
>
> I tried to resolve this with the following:
>
> permission java.io.FilePermission
> "\H:\JBoss-2.2.1\tmp\deploy\Default\DbTester.jar\-", "read";
>
> but got the same error again. Two questions:
>
> (1) Why doesn't the above permission address the error?
> (2) I don't understand the required permission. Why is it asking for read
> permission on a JBoss temp directory for the client? Notice that it has a
> drive letter. This will be completely irrelevant when the client is run from
> another computer (which I tried - it does indeed still ask for \H:\.) I
> haven't implemented any method security in the bean or any logon
> requirements.
What do you mean client? JVM executing JBoss instance needs to read your
filesystems? Do you allow it or not, there is no client in this story...
Try using substitutions - ${jboss.home}\tmp for cross platform
independence. See java.policy and java.security files in your jdk distro.
HTH,
Vlada
>
> Everything works if I have the blanket all permissions.
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> JBoss-user mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
>
_______________________________________________
JBoss-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
