Yes, exactly so. I should have made it clear, sorry. The naming
convention is XXXHome and XXX are the home and remote interfaces, and
XXXBean is a value object that conforms to the JavaBean spec (required
further on in the app).
The id field is constrained as a primary key - I was under the
impression that this implied that nulls were not permitted.
So the problem seems to be that the remote interfaces in the collection
returned by findAll seem to have lost their record of the id of the bean
they represent. Is this to do with my use of value objects? Is it
necessary to have a simple getter for the primary key on the remote
interface?
jim
> Actually looks to me as though his PersonBean is a kind of Data Value
> Objects that's serialized over the wire.
> >
> > It looks unusual to directly access any class called ...Bean.
> > The standard
> > naming convention would imply this to be a class that only the container
> > would directly reference. Application code would access the
> > remote instead.
> > Maybe the problem has to do with that.
> >
_______________________________________________
JBoss-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
