thanks for the example, I will follow it. After adding the jar that contains
the bean I want to call to the lib\ext directory the lookup worked.
> -----Mensaje original-----
> De: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]En nombre de Juha
> Lindfors
> Enviado el: jueves 7 de junio de 2001 14:26
> Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Asunto: RE: [JBoss-user] Everlasting sessionbean, now a MBean
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> At 18:12 6.6.2001 +0200, you wrote:
> >After starting jbosss, I use the 8082 html page to invoke the method that
> >connects to the socket (I asume that this has another benefit,
> as it is not
> >anymore an ejb and it does comply the spec??)
>
> yes.
>
> >
> >When a receive data from the socket I want to call a session
> bean, but when
> >I do the:
> > Object ref = jndiContext.lookup("jms/SendAlarm");
> >a JMRuntimeException is thrown.
> >
> >Is there a way to indicate to a mbean that it will use a bean??
>
> There's no need for that. The MBean is just another ordinary Java class
> with management interface. You can code it as you would any EJB client.
>
> Try cathing the NamingException from lookup, it should tell you what's
> going wrong. For an example of an MBean doing jndi lookup and jms
> messaging
> you can check the code in:
> http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/jboss/admin/src/org
/jboss/adm
in/mbean/SystemMonitor.java?rev=1.3&content-type=text/vnd.viewcvs-markup
-- Juha
>
>thanks,
>
>
>> -----Mensaje original-----
>> De: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]En nombre de Juha
>> Lindfors
>> Enviado el: martes 5 de junio de 2001 21:28
>> Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Asunto: Re: [JBoss-user] Everlasting sessionbean
>>
>>
>> At 20:10 5.6.2001 +0200, you wrote:
>> >1. now I am using a client app just to invoke the session bean's only
>> >function, is there a way in jboss to make a session bean instantiate and
>> >invoke a method without a client (just for easier administration).
>> >
>> >2. is there a problem if the session bean's function never
>> returns?? It is
>> >reading from the socket forever.
>> >
>> >3. Should it be statefull, statelesss... any other proposition?
>>
>> Yes, don't use either. Instead create an MBean for the task. Then you can
>> get rid of the client app as well.
>>
>> -- Juha
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> JBoss-user mailing list
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>JBoss-user mailing list
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
>
_______________________________________________
JBoss-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
_______________________________________________
JBoss-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
