A fix is in main and will be in the next release of the 2.4 beta.

----- Original Message -----
From: "J. King" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Joseph King" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Greg Hamel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Tony 
Enerson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Tony Enerson
(Office)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Bernie Wieser (Office)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; 
"Greg Hamel (Office)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, July 01, 2001 12:55 AM
Subject: RE: [JBoss-user] Possible naming bug JBoss 2.2.2 with Tomcat 3.2.2


>
> Scott,
>
> Thank you very much. You have confirmed that I am not insane.
>
> Does anyone have any idea regarding the fix for the env-entry elements and
> implementation of war ENC content integration into JNDI (i.e. is it in 2.4?)
>
> j.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Scott M
> Stark
> Sent: Saturday, June 30, 2001 5:34 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] Possible naming bug JBoss 2.2.2 with Tomcat
> 3.2.2
>
>
> JBoss-2.2.2/Tomcat-3.2.2 works with env-entry elements defined
> in the web.xml descriptor. There does appear to be a bug in the handling
> of env-entry elements with more than one intermediate context in
> the env-entry-name.
>
> There is no env-entry in jboss-web.dtd because they do not need a mapping to
> an existing JNDI name.
>
> The war ENC contents have not yet been integrated into the JNDIView of the
> JNDI tree so that is why you cannot see them there.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "J. King" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: "Joseph King" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Greg Hamel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
> "Tony Enerson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Tony Enerson
> (Office)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Bernie Wieser (Office)"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Greg Hamel (Office)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Saturday, June 30, 2001 4:30 PM
> Subject: RE: [JBoss-user] Possible naming bug JBoss 2.2.2 with Tomcat 3.2.2
>
>
> >
> > Ok. Let me explain this again because I am getting no love here.
> >
> > It seems to me that you cannot declare environment entries in 'web.xml'
> and
> > have them used in JNDI by Tomcat applications (i.e. servlets, jsps,
> etc...).
> > An environment entry in 'web.xml' looks something like this:
> >
> > <web-app>
> > ...
> > <env-entry>
> > <env-entry-name>ejb/catalog/CatalogDAOClass</env-entry-name>
> > <env-entry-value>com.sun....dao.CatalogDAOImpl</env-entry-value>
> > <env-entry-type>java.lang.String</env-entry-type>
> > <env-entry>
> > ...
> > </web-app>
> >
> > The result of this at deployment time is that your application server
> should
> > create a JNDI entry scoped under, or local to,  a name relative to your
> > resource. For example, the same environment entry in 'ejb-jar.xml' for a
> > session bean produces the following output in the JNDI JMX console:
> >
> > ...
> >
> > java:comp namespace of the TheCatalog bean:
> >   +- env (class: org.jnp.interfaces.NamingContext)
> >   |   +- jdbc (class: org.jnp.interfaces.NamingContext)
> >   |   |   +- EstoreDataSource[link -> java:/EstoreDB] (class:
> > javax.naming.LinkRef)
> >   |   +- ejb (class: org.jnp.interfaces.NamingContext)
> >   |   |   +- catalog (class: org.jnp.interfaces.NamingContext)
> >   |   |   |   +- CatalogDAOClass (class: java.lang.String)
> >
> > ...
> >
> > Something similar should normally be created for Tomcat.
> >
> > The result of this configuration is that one can do something portable
> > inside your code like this:
> >
> > myInitialContext.lookup( "java:comp/env/ejb/catalog/CatalogDAOClass" );
> >
> > One does this because it is not portable across deployments to hard-code
> any
> > server-wide JNDI names into your code. Therefore EJB 1.1 provides an
> > environmental JNDI context that is local to each deployed EJB (one
> > environment per home) and this also extends to servlet containers (or
> > should). The prefix "java:comp/env" means the JNDI context local to the
> > component you are trying to access.
> >
> > With me so far? Ok. Now the rub is that it appears JBoss2.2.2w/Tomcat3.2.2
> > completely ignore environment entries in 'web.xml'. Other items like
> > resource references or ejb-references must be specified in a file called
> > 'jboss-web.xml'. The DTD for 'jboss-web.xml' looks like this (btw.. this
> DTD
> > is hard to find, could someone put it in the Documentation Files link?):
> >
> > <?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8' ?>
> >
> >   <!-- The JBoss specific elements used to integrate the servlet
> >        web.xml elements into a JBoss deployment.
> >   -->
> >   <!-- The jboss-web element is the root element.
> >   -->
> >   <!ELEMENT jboss-web (resource-ref* , ejb-ref*)>
> >
> >   <!ELEMENT ejb-ref (ejb-ref-name , jndi-name)>
> >
> >   <!ELEMENT ejb-ref-name (#PCDATA)>
> >
> >   <!ELEMENT jndi-name (#PCDATA)>
> >
> >   <!ELEMENT resource-ref (res-ref-name , jndi-name)>
> >
> >   <!ELEMENT res-ref-name (#PCDATA)>
> >
> > Note that there is no provision for an environment entry (which would be
> > something like '<!ELEMENT env-entry (env-entry-name, env-entry-value,
> > env-entry-type)>'. Because environment entries are not resource references
> > or ejb references you cannot kludge them into 'jboss-web.xml'. If you try,
> > say, creating a resource reference in 'jboss-web.xml'to map to an
> > environment entry you will be faced with two different problems:
> >
> > 1. Without an equivalent resource reference entry in 'web.xml' you will
> get
> > a deployment error.
> > 2. Trying to translate an environment entry into a resource reference
> won't
> > work because they aren't the same thing.
> >
> > If I am correct in the above, you will have to rework applications like
> > PetStore 1.1.2 to work with JBoss and not simply change a few deployment
> > items.
> >
> > Some confirmation of this would be nice from anyone on the JBoss team
> > reading this list. Any changes in this behavior in 2.4 would also be good
> to
> > know.
> >
> > Thanks, very much, for your efforts. If I have the time I will rummage
> > through the source code and see what I can implement on my own for JBoss
> > (not Petstore).
> >
> > j.
> >
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> JBoss-user mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> JBoss-user mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
>


_______________________________________________
JBoss-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user

Reply via email to