Sorry for the slow reply. No, AFAIK we're not thinking about moving away from a TreeCache-based approach, or at least if we are it's way back in the back of someone's mind. But can we get the benefit of your experiences anyway? :) We're definitely interested.
BTW, reviewing your patch revealed a major bug in the existing implementation -- http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBCACHE-396. So thanks for that as well. I'll be applying changes that are pretty much your patch next week. Only semi-significant change is when the add method searches for a new key, it starts with the size of the existing key set rather than 0. This will leave gaps in the keys, but that doesn't matter in a Set. Looks like the List implementation could benefit from the same approach. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3920139#3920139 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3920139 ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ JBoss-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
