Jacob has also been arguing for an @Component annotation that implies the @Name
from the EJB name. I'm not against this, but I wanted to see how popular it
would be first.
But let me just point out that it is not as if you are writing something
totally redundant here. You shouldn't be writing:
@Stateful(name="ManagerLogin")
| @Name("ManagerLogin")
Rather, it would be:
@Stateful(name="ManagerLogin")
| @Name("managerLogin")
Or even, potentially:
@Stateful(name="ManagerLoginBean")
| @Name("managerLogin")
And again, @Stateful(name="...') is only there in the rare case where we have
two beans with the same classname in the same EAR.
Still, I will continue to think about an @Component annotation.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3922646#3922646
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3922646
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
JBoss-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
