Technically the column data type is 'OID', the Java object is String, and my
mapping is:

<jdbc-type>BLOB</jdbc-type>
<sql-type>OID</sql-type>

in my jaws.xml.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Scott Stevelinck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2001 11:03 PM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] CMP of a byte[] array vanishes on
re-deployment(fwd)


> Yes, I'm storing it as text.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Dmitri Colebatch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2001 8:05 PM
> Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] CMP of a byte[] array vanishes on
> re-deployment(fwd)
>
>
> > sorry - itchy trigger finger...  as I was saying...
> >
> > if you're encoding it as Base64 I'm assuming its text... just checking -
I
> > have this situation working fine with text.
> >
> > cheesr
> > dim
> >
> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2001 10:03:59 +1000 (EST)
> > From: Dmitri Colebatch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] CMP of a byte[] array vanishes on
re-deployment
> >
> > Are you saving the field as text of byte[].  If you're encoding
> >
> > On Wed, 25 Jul 2001, Scott Stevelinck wrote:
> >
> > > I have what I would consider an extremely odd issue.  I'm encoding a
> > > byte[] using Base64 into a container managed field.  I'm using
> > > Postgres as my back end database.  Everything works fine when the bean
> > > read/writes that byte[] array to the database (of course it's actually
> > > writing the encoded string to an OID field in the back end table).
> > > Now the problem, if I re-deploy the bean ALL the byte[] get changed to
> > > something odd that's only 6k, when they were 12k-14k before the
> > > re-deployment.  All the other fields in the table remain untouched.
> > >
> > > I've inserted debug code into the bean and it doesn't appear that
> > > ejbStore() is getting called, which should be the ONLY place a db
> > > write is occurring.  I don't see anything funny in the server.log that
> > > would indicate the database is being modified?
> > >
> > > Any ideas??
> > >
> > > --Scott
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > JBoss-user mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> JBoss-user mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
>


_______________________________________________
JBoss-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user

Reply via email to