Should we beware of the boogie monster too. Unless someone
gives a specific legal issue all that I see just happened is
a competitor just introducing fear into the group to sway
people away from a great app server.
If Sun had a problem with JBoss they should have stomped on
them when they were EJBoss, before they changed the name
,from what I recall, at the request of Sun.
John
-----Original Message-----
From: Tejaswi Redkar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 10:24 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [JBoss-user] OpenSource and J2EE licensing
What is this legal trouble for ?
If there is any expected legal trouble, should we stop using JBoss ?
-----Original Message-----
From: Paul A Morgan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 9:51 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] OpenSource and J2EE licensing
Kemp,
A few points of information:
1. Yes Lutris sells and supports both their Lutris
Enhydra product, recently tested by Intel as the fastest
application server around running a modified version of the
PetStore application, and Lutris EAS, a services
architecture based J2EE platform.
2. There was no community help or involvement in
creating Enhydra Enterprise.
3. Personally, I wish JBoss luck, but suspect that legal
troubles are just around the corner...
- Paul
--
Paul A Morgan
Chief Technology Officer
Lutris Technologies, Inc.
1200 Pacific Avenue, Suite 300
Santa Cruz, CA 95060 USA
831.460.7307; 831.471.9754 (fax)
http://www.lutris.com
http://www.enhydra.org
----- Original Message -----
From: "Kemp Randy-W18971" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 6:13 AM
Subject: [JBoss-user] OpenSource and J2EE licensing
> I have some big issues with Lutris on this. They spend
several months having
> the open source community develop their server for them,
then -- just at the
> point the open source community perfected it, they pulled
the plug. Is that
> convenient, or what? Now I understand that the licensing
document is
> extremely vague, and I have seen it in the Orion list.
From what I
> understand, Jboss is just creating an EJB server, just
like Jonas (only
> better). Tomcat and Jetty, which are separate projects,
are creating the
> JSP/Servlet component. And Lutris is trying to get Sun
J2EE certification,
> while Jboss is not there yet. And I also looked at the
commercial offering
> of Lutris. While they sell the J2EE server for $995, they
offer support
> packages per incident base. Yet they don't offer this for
their EAS server
> (from my reading what they support). Do they offer a
commercial product,
> but are afraid to support it?
>
> Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2001 16:02:53 -0700 (PDT)
> From: nathan frund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [JBoss-user] OpenSource and J2EE licensing
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Hi all, recenlty Lutris pulled the plug on its
> OpenSource Enhydra Enterprise server citing that J2EE
> licensing is incompatible with all OpenSource
> licenses. Does this have any impact on JBoss?
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> JBoss-user mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
_______________________________________________
JBoss-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
_______________________________________________
JBoss-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
