I can do that when I get to work tomorrow, but the basic question is if the behavior I'm seeing is the way it is supposed to work or not. Surely that can be answered without seeing process definitions. When I run the sub-process as its own process, it stops at wait states and doesn't resume until assigned actors finish the tasks. When I run it as a subprocess, it just goes right through without ever assigning tasks and waiting. Your response implies it should stop at the wait states, and I am doing something wrong. So I will post the processes as soon as possible. Thanks.
View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3936145#3936145 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3936145 ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ JBoss-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
