1: that's what 3.2 is going to, you can define your own input types for variables. 3.1 just renders everything as a textinput 2: Look at the Jira, there is an issue for it, so it is on the list. Care to help out? 3: That is the real challenge, and the one where (afaik) all bpm vendors fail to a certain extend. We, the company I work for, also need this. The thing is that our developers tend to want to use spring-mvc instead of jsf. So I have to convince them and we might be able to contribute something on this level. If you have some ideas on how to solve this, we might take this subject to the developer list or even create a Jira issue for this.
The separation of automatic vs human interaction is fully supported by jBPM. (JDPL is the definition language, not jBPML). A generic node can be used for this. Look at the documentation and/or testcases. hth a little and thanks for the compliments. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3937296#3937296 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3937296 ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ JBoss-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
