I am trying to understand how the partition name is applied to the cluster. My initital impression was that two JBoss instances with two different partition names would treat each other are completely irrelevant, but this doesn't seem to be the case.
My configuration currently has 4 JGroups configurations in the MBeans for... * org.jboss.ha.framework.server.ClusterPartition * org.jboss.cache.TreeCache (TomcatClusteringCache) * org.jboss.ejb3.cache.tree.PassivationTreeCache (EJB3SFSBClusteredCache) * org.jboss.cache.TreeCache (EJB3EntityTreeCache) Of these, only the first has any mention of the partition name. The rest will quite happily chat with all other servers listening on the same mcast_port regardless of the configured partition name. Is this the expected behaviour? As I have found the other JGroups configurations (for HTTP sessions, SFSB and Entities), I am starting to wonder what the ClusterPartition is actually used for. Seems the other groups have most of the actual functionality covered. I guess my question is whether the partition name is supposed to be applied to all of the JGroups (so it can be a true partition) or whether this is by design. Thanks View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3938397#3938397 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3938397 ------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ JBoss-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
