Reading Gavin's last post - I suspect the test will be half worthwhile and half not. There is hope for the first test -- all the portlets and Seam components in the Same EAR (component registry belongs to the Web Application) - but it still needs to be confirmed with a test. If it does work, I think it should be part of the Portlet support of the eb Bean specification. :)
I'm certain the second scenario will not work at all. It won't work with two WARs or two EARs (with good reason - namespace collisions on Component names would suck *ahem* be unfortunate) so why should it work on Portlets ? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3946364#3946364 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3946364 ------------------------------------------------------- All the advantages of Linux Managed Hosting--Without the Cost and Risk! Fully trained technicians. The highest number of Red Hat certifications in the hosting industry. Fanatical Support. Click to learn more http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=107521&bid=248729&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ JBoss-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
