If that is the way to go i must consider it. Because i do not want to go 
against the flow.

But actually i solved the problem by adding to line of code to the persistance 
code.

DbPersistenceService.java

// added
session.flush();

session.clear();

// before
transaction.commit();

This seems to help my out of memory.

But i havent testet it to death yet.

But wat i want to do next is off load the variables to a queue
and process it from there. 

But now i'm first trying to get a grip on the logging.

(Now posting a new post about the processInstance id)

thx Patrick




View the original post : 
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3947578#3947578

Reply to the post : 
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3947578


-------------------------------------------------------
All the advantages of Linux Managed Hosting--Without the Cost and Risk!
Fully trained technicians. The highest number of Red Hat certifications in
the hosting industry. Fanatical Support. Click to learn more
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=107521&bid=248729&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
JBoss-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user

Reply via email to