No, actually, after each remote method call the instance is placed back into the pool, you can never be sure that the next call on the same remote object will use the dame instance..
Joost. -----Original Message----- From: Dmitri Colebatch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2001 4:52 PM To: David Ward Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] Stateless Session remove() question afaik the server will only let one thread in a SLSB at a time, so I assume that the container will hold the instance as "busy" until you call remove. not based on any knowledge of the internals... cheers dim On Tue, 9 Oct 2001, David Ward wrote: > Is there any benefit / penalty for calling or not calling remove() on > the remote interface of my stateless session bean? According to the > ejb1.1 spec diagrams, it looks like ejbRemove will only get called on a > stateFUL session bean. Should I or should I not be calling remove() > when I'm done? > > > _______________________________________________ > JBoss-user mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user > _______________________________________________ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user _______________________________________________ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
