I was just pointing out the difference with regards to the way things are implemented now and why the two styles of invocation didn't act the same with regard to pageflow. I didn't understand the distinction myself until we talked about it a month or two ago, and so I definitely think most users would be confused by this.
I *think* I would prefer the the page action and invoke application action to work the same for pageflows, but even if they are different, I would expect an s:link action to work like an h:commandLink action. Maybe some other Seam users here can comment on what they feel is more natural. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3955183#3955183 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3955183 Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ JBoss-user mailing list JBoss-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
