the only thing is don't run in passivation (artificial limitation if you remember the class) so test with passivation either dissabled or very high, which is the way the default is done in 3.0
marcf |-----Original Message----- |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Lennart |Petersson |Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 7:24 AM |To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |Subject: [JBoss-user] Does JBoss scale well when using stateful session |beans.... | | |I'm in the start of a major rewrite of our first EJB application |that so far has only used |stateless session beans as facade to CMP entity beans. Now i'm |thinking of using |a stateful session bean in a case more or less like a shopping cart. | |Trying to analyse future customers and what load there might be we |are guessing that 2500 |concurrent clients might be a top peak that we have to handle. |This is not primarly a web app, |only standalone remote Java clients. | |One reason is that there is a lot of things i would like to keep |alive during a clients session but not |permanantly store in database. Today this is kept on the client, |but i would prefer to move it to |the server: thinner client, more suitable for different kind of |clients (web, pda, cell...) etc... | |How well would JBoss, with right hardware, handle 2500 activly |used stateful session beans? |I understand that it will take some memory, i'm more concerned |about JBoss effectiveness and |stability with this load. Of course there is plenty of entity |beans and stateless session beans also. | |/L | |=================== |Lennart Petersson | |www.benefit.se/english |[EMAIL PROTECTED] | | | |_______________________________________________ |JBoss-user mailing list |[EMAIL PROTECTED] |https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user _______________________________________________ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
