Hi David,

Ok, so my assumption was right. We have a "true" XA-JDBC datasource, and
using it with the XADataSourceLoader was successful.

Thanks David

-Kris

btw
<please lose the html>
My email client is set up to use plain text only but something must have
slipped. I will check in the future when posting to this group.


----- Original Message -----
From: "David Jencks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 11:48 PM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] The corect way to set up XA-datasource


> On 2002.01.16 16:15:12 -0500 Kris Kristensen wrote:
> > Could somebody please shed some light on the difference between these,
> > and explain which one shold be used for XA
> >
> > ---JDBCDataSourceLoader
>
> No transaction control possible from jboss. Use only from e.g. servlets
> where you are calling commit on your connections yourself.
>
> > ---RawXADataSourceLoader
> Something added at some point to help with the xa jca wrapper I believe. I
> don't know of any valid use, since you can specify the XADataSource class
> directly now.
>
> > ---XADataSourceLoader.java
>
> MBean that you should use for setting up a usable DataSource that your
> ejb's and JAWS can use in jboss 2.4.x.  Most people appear to be using
jdbc
> 1 drivers that do not support xa transactions.  In this case you wrap your
> Driver class with the XADataSourceImpl.java, the driver to use being
> determined by the jdbc url. (you still don't get xa semantics, but your
> transactions are committed by jboss).  If you have an XADataSource (such
as
> some Oracle drivers), you can use it directly in the XADataSourceLoader.
>
> The sharing semantics of jdbc 1 and xa connections/transactions are quite
> different from one another and I have been unsuccessful in figuring out
how
> XADataSourceLoader deals with this.
>
> In jboss 3, all db access is via wrapping jdbc drivers and XADataSources
in
> jca resource adapters.  All these mbeans are gone from 3.0.  I think it's
a
> lot simpler.  The different semantics for the different tx types are
> clearly expressed in different code.
>
> david jencks
> >
> >
> > -Kris
> >
> please lose the html
>
> _______________________________________________
> JBoss-user mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user



_______________________________________________
JBoss-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user

Reply via email to