Hello jboss-user-request, Friday, February 01, 2002, 6:12:16 PM, you wrote:
jurlsn> Send JBoss-user mailing list submissions to jurlsn> [EMAIL PROTECTED] jurlsn> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit jurlsn> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user jurlsn> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to jurlsn> [EMAIL PROTECTED] jurlsn> You can reach the person managing the list at jurlsn> [EMAIL PROTECTED] jurlsn> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific jurlsn> than "Re: Contents of JBoss-user digest..." jurlsn> Today's Topics: jurlsn> 1. EmbeddedCatalina and Valves (Robin Cavanaugh) jurlsn> 2. Re: Several XADataSourceLoaders for just one database (Dmitri Colebatch) jurlsn> 3. Re: Several XADataSourceLoaders for just one database (Guy Rouillier) jurlsn> 4. Re: Binding objects into JNDI (Scott M Stark) jurlsn> 5. RE: Several XADataSourceLoaders for just one database ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) jurlsn> 6. JBoss as general service container? (jfina) jurlsn> 7. SSL Redirection Problem (Dan Feltham) jurlsn> 8. virtual hosts again... (=?iso-8859-2?Q?Jarecsni_J=E1nos?=) jurlsn> 9. FW: virtual hosts again... (=?iso-8859-2?Q?Jarecsni_J=E1nos?=) jurlsn> 10. RE: FW: virtual hosts again... (Coetmeur, Alain) jurlsn> 11. RE: FW: virtual hosts again... (Coetmeur, Alain) jurlsn> 12. RE: SSL Redirection Problem (Coetmeur, Alain) jurlsn> --__--__-- jurlsn> Message: 1 jurlsn> From: "Robin Cavanaugh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> jurlsn> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> jurlsn> Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 22:40:31 -0500 jurlsn> Subject: [JBoss-user] EmbeddedCatalina and Valves jurlsn> Hello, jurlsn> Has anyone had any luck getting _any_ Valves to work using the jurlsn> EmbeddedCatalinaServiceSX? Specifically, I am trying to get the jurlsn> AccessLogValve to work. jurlsn> I have tried to configure the mbean in jboss.jcml using several variations jurlsn> on the following theme to no avail, including: jurlsn> <mbean code="org.jboss.web.catalina.EmbeddedCatalinaServiceSX" jurlsn> name="DefaultDomain:service=EmbeddedTomcat" > jurlsn> <attribute name="Port">80</attribute> jurlsn> <attribute name="Config"> jurlsn> <Valve className="org.apache.catalina.valves.AccessLogValve" jurlsn> prefix="localhost_access_log." suffix=".txt" pattern="common" jurlsn> directory="/opt/jboss/jboss/log"/> jurlsn> </attribute> jurlsn> </mbean> jurlsn> ...or... jurlsn> <mbean code="org.jboss.web.catalina.EmbeddedCatalinaServiceSX" jurlsn> name="DefaultDomain:service=EmbeddedTomcat" > jurlsn> <attribute name="Config"> jurlsn> <Server port="8005" shutdown="SHUTDOWN" debug="0"> jurlsn> <Service name="Embedded-Tomcat"> jurlsn> <Connector className="org.apache.catalina.connector.http.HttpConnector" jurlsn> port="80" minProcessors="5" maxProcessors="75" jurlsn> enableLookups="true" redirectPort="8443" acceptCount="10" debug="0" jurlsn> connectionTimeout="60000"/> jurlsn> <Engine name="EmbeddedTC" defaultHost="localhost" debug="0"> jurlsn> <Host name="localhost" debug="0" appBase="webapps" unpackWARs="true"> jurlsn> <Valve className="org.apache.catalina.valves.AccessLogValve" jurlsn> prefix="localhost_access_log." suffix=".txt" pattern="common" jurlsn> directory="/opt/jboss/jboss/log"/> jurlsn> </Host> jurlsn> </Engine> jurlsn> </Service> jurlsn> </Server> jurlsn> </attribute> jurlsn> </mbean> jurlsn> Any help would be appreciated. jurlsn> Thanks, jurlsn> Robin Cavanaugh jurlsn> --__--__-- jurlsn> Message: 2 jurlsn> From: "Dmitri Colebatch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> jurlsn> To: "Guy Rouillier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, jurlsn> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> jurlsn> Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] Several XADataSourceLoaders for just one database jurlsn> Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2002 14:53:36 +1100 jurlsn> is this actually going to be any better than having one pool double the size? I'd assume the cost putting the logic on the client jurlsn> side means you'd be worse off than if you just had a bigger pool to start with.? jurlsn> cheesr jurlsn> dim jurlsn> ----- Original Message ----- jurlsn> From: "Guy Rouillier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> jurlsn> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> jurlsn> Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 2:20 PM jurlsn> Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] Several XADataSourceLoaders for just one database >> Sure, you can have as many pools against one database as you want (realizing >> that most DBMSs have connection limits.) Just give each pool a unique name. >> >> <mbean code="org.jboss.jdbc.XADataSourceLoader" >> name="DefaultDomain:service=XADataSource,name=myDB"> >> <attribute name="PoolName">myDB</attribute> >> >> <mbean code="org.jboss.jdbc.XADataSourceLoader" >> name="DefaultDomain:service=XADataSource,name=my2ndDB"> >> <attribute name="PoolName">my2ndDB</attribute> >> >> Everything else would be the same for the two data sources. >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 8:21 AM >> Subject: [JBoss-user] Several XADataSourceLoaders for just one database >> >> >> > After some not successfully trials, I have a new Idea. >> > >> > Is it possible to configure two or more XADataSourceLoader to just one >> > Database. >> > As I tried this I've got an >> > javax.naming.NameAlreadyBoundException. >> > >> > I want to configure two or more pools to just one database. So when a >> > connectionpools hasnt any free connections left for an user, the database >> user >> > could be switched to the next pool to reach the database. >> > >> > Many Thanks in Advance! >> > Sjus >> > >> > -- >> > GMX - Die Kommunikationsplattform im Internet. >> > http://www.gmx.net >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > JBoss-user mailing list >> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> JBoss-user mailing list >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user jurlsn> --__--__-- jurlsn> Message: 3 jurlsn> From: "Guy Rouillier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> jurlsn> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> jurlsn> Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] Several XADataSourceLoaders for just one database jurlsn> Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2002 00:25:48 -0500 jurlsn> I doubt it, but that's what the man asked for. I'd personally just go with jurlsn> the bigger pool. jurlsn> ----- Original Message ----- jurlsn> From: "Dmitri Colebatch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> jurlsn> To: "Guy Rouillier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; jurlsn> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> jurlsn> Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 10:53 PM jurlsn> Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] Several XADataSourceLoaders for just one database >> is this actually going to be any better than having one pool double the jurlsn> size? I'd assume the cost putting the logic on the client >> side means you'd be worse off than if you just had a bigger pool to start jurlsn> with.? >> >> cheesr >> dim >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Guy Rouillier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 2:20 PM >> Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] Several XADataSourceLoaders for just one jurlsn> database >> >> >> > Sure, you can have as many pools against one database as you want jurlsn> (realizing >> > that most DBMSs have connection limits.) Just give each pool a unique jurlsn> name. jurlsn> --__--__-- jurlsn> Message: 4 jurlsn> Reply-To: "Scott M Stark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> jurlsn> From: "Scott M Stark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> jurlsn> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> jurlsn> Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] Binding objects into JNDI jurlsn> Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 22:36:50 -0800 jurlsn> Organization: JBoss Group jurlsn> The java:comp/env context is a special read-only context available to J2EE jurlsn> components that is local to one component. The only information that can jurlsn> be in there is what you have specified in the deployment descriptors. Use jurlsn> a different binding name like just "factories/ObjectFactory" jurlsn> xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx jurlsn> Scott Stark jurlsn> Chief Technology Officer jurlsn> JBoss Group, LLC jurlsn> xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx jurlsn> ----- Original Message ----- jurlsn> From: Dan Berger jurlsn> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] jurlsn> Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 7:01 PM jurlsn> Subject: [JBoss-user] Binding objects into JNDI jurlsn> Greetings. jurlsn> I'm writing in the hopes that someone on this list can straighten me out on jurlsn> something - I'm trying to write non app-server specific code, deployable as jurlsn> part of a .ear, to bind an object into the JNDI tree and I'm having a devil jurlsn> of a time. jurlsn> I've read just about everything I can get my hands on - including the JNDI jurlsn> tutorial at Sun - and so far, no dice. jurlsn> I've even sifted through the jboss code a bit hoping to glean the secrets jurlsn> from it - and still, no progress. jurlsn> To be more specific - what I want to do is allow a factory object to bind jurlsn> itself into the JNDI tree during ear deployment - so that application code jurlsn> in that ear can do something like this: jurlsn> Context ctx = new InitialContext(); jurlsn> ObjectFactory = ( ObjectFactory ) obj.lookup( jurlsn> "java:/comp/env/factories/ObjectFactory" ); jurlsn> CreatedObject = ObjectFactory.newInstance( "someArg" ); jurlsn> Where ObjectFactory is just a run-of-the-mill Java class. jurlsn> I've tried various things - including having ObjectFactory implement jurlsn> Serializable, Referenceable, and even ObjectFactory. I've tried (re)binding jurlsn> it into the tree from a static block and from a servlet/jsp. In either jurlsn> case, I get an exception "Factory not bound." jurlsn> I've tried adding a jndi.properties file to the jar containing the class - jurlsn> only to discover (by code inspection) that JBoss only looks for jurlsn> jndi.properties files once - on startup; not on each application deployment. jurlsn> Any suggestions or examples would be greatly appreciated. jurlsn> Cheers. jurlsn> -- jurlsn> Dan Berger [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] jurlsn> "We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then, is not an act, jurlsn> but a habit." jurlsn> -- Aristotle jurlsn> "It comes in pints?!" jurlsn> -- Pippin jurlsn> --__--__-- jurlsn> Message: 5 jurlsn> Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2002 13:49:42 +0100 (MET) jurlsn> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] jurlsn> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] jurlsn> Subject: RE: [JBoss-user] Several XADataSourceLoaders for just one database jurlsn> Yeah, I've got only a naming error, now its working with these two pools. jurlsn> I try to increase the DatabaseConnectionpoolsize dynamically, during the jurlsn> server is running. But all my trials doesnt really work, nothing were effected. jurlsn> So I thought to make two pools, so that blocked connections could be jurlsn> forwarded to the second pool, if there aren't any free connections left. jurlsn> I don't have any good solution for these dynamically increasing. jurlsn> Maybe somebody has gained some experiences with this? jurlsn> I'm still very interested in any advices. jurlsn> Many thanks in advance! jurlsn> Sjus -- Best regards, Roman mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
