guys. jboss is a central piece of our infrastructure, and we would like to keep recommending it to customers. it might be prudent not to piss all over sun in the name of jboss. it certainly won't make certification happen any quicker. i know that intellectual arrogance is hip in some way, but the java community needs to pull together or we'll all be coding visual basic... the problem you mention sounds serious. if you state your case clearly and persistently, i'm sure sun will respond. 1.4 has been out in beta for a while, why is this just being discovered now?
long live jboss, let's keep it above the belt. eric -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of marc fleury Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:01 AM To: Jung , Dr. Christoph; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [JBoss-user] RE: Bomb the bug parade! was AW: [JBoss-dev] Thread deadlock in class loader |I have no idea whether these guys have ever reopened a bug after being |bombed with comments? I'll go in there and insult them in the name of jboss :) |Maybe you should not mention Jboss to increase the chances of being not |ignored ??? actually do the contrary. TogetherSoft just ran a poll (http://www.togethercommunity.com) where they ask "what J2EE app server do you use for your enterprise development" JBoss: 43% BEA: 29% IBM: 10% everyone else 0-4% the arrogance of the ignorant will never cease to amaze me... ignore them! bombard the list with "ignoramus" and let SUN be SUN... |May the source be with you, we know you like the TM violation but "source" takes a TM in JBoss :) marcf _______________________________________________ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user _______________________________________________ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
