On lør, 2002-06-08 at 01:33, Dain Sundstrom wrote: > It is not about performance it's about manageability in production. > Widows is simple too much of a pain to manage on a large scale. > > -dain For example, what do you do when running jboss on win and need to fix something somewhere only connected to Internet with a modem. Run a slow fullscreen-connection (like pcanywhere) to the win-server? It will certainly be slow. Or log in with telnet (which is insecure) and try to do in on the dos-command line? What if 2 pepole need to access it at the same time?
With jboss running on linux (or similar OSes), you can just log in with ssh, check logs, fix config/change code, compile and deploy it, restart jboss etc. without problems from anywhere (including public web terminals if you have a web-ssh client set up) in a secure way. > > Tejeshwar wrote: > > > Hi.. > > > > > > > > > > > > I want to know one thing. > > > > My question, > > > > > > > > JBoss on windows/linux, which gives better performance? > > > > whether windows or linux. > > > > > > > > Pls reply back as early as possible. > > > > > > > > Thanking you > > > > > > > > with regards > > > > > > > > Tejesh > > > > > > _______________________________________________________________ > > Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference > August 25-28 in Las Vegas - >http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm?source=osdntextlink > > _______________________________________________ > JBoss-user mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user _______________________________________________________________ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas - http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm?source=osdntextlink _______________________________________________ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
