Hi Scott,
the most important differences are:
- we are of course using our own security-domain
(which does *not* accept "empty authentication")
- I kicked the ProxyFactoryFinderInterceptor out of the MDB chain because:
- I was too dumb to understand it fully
- it gave me a "invokerBInding is null in ProxyFactoryFinder"
debug message
- everything ran well without it
- I asked the forum and nobody could (or did) explain to me
what this is for.
But listening to some discussion on jboss-dev I learned that 3_2
supports multiple
invokers per container; I suspect that exactly this is what it is for, but:
I could not find where anybody injects the binding in the "mi" of
ProxyFactoryFinderInterceptor.invoke() in the case of MDB.
1) Could this have something to do with my problem?
2) Is there a place where I can learn something about the
ProxyFactoryFinderInterceptor concept?
Thanks in advance,
Michael
PS.:
I will soon be absent for a few days because we install our software
on our customers servers. I might be unable to read/answer my mail
depending on how fast you answer.
Scott M Stark wrote:
>How does this differ from the RunAsMDB test case in the security unit tests?
>Look at them in the testsuite module in the org/jboss/test/security stuff and
>how this differs from your config.
>
>xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Scott Stark
>Chief Technology Officer
>JBoss Group, LLC
>xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Michael Bartmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2002 8:05 AM
>Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] Run-As Problems?
>
>
>
>
>>Hi,
>>
>>further study shows that the the run-as mechanism works in other places
>>(other than MDB, e.g. Session to Session).
>>Could there be a problem with the RunAsSecurityInterceptor not
>>parsing the xml metadata correctly?
>>
>>Michael
>>
>>PS.: I have a hardcoded Interceptor in place, which sets some hardcoded
>>username for he MDB. *This works*. But I'd like to be "dynamic" and use
>>the xml metadata to specify the run-as-role through the .xml-files.
>>
>>
>>Michael Bartmann wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>Hi everyone,
>>>are there any known issues with the run-as mechanism under Branch_3_2?
>>>We use this for the onMessage-method and tried to put the
>>>RunAsSecurityInterceptor in the interceptor chain (of the MDB and the
>>>SessionBean),
>>>but to no avail.
>>>Enjoy,
>>>Michael
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>-------------------------------------------------------
>>>This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old
>>>cell phone? Get a new here for FREE!
>>>https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>JBoss-user mailing list
>>>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>-------------------------------------------------------
>>This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old
>>cell phone? Get a new here for FREE!
>>https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390
>>_______________________________________________
>>JBoss-user mailing list
>>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>-------------------------------------------------------
>This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old
>cell phone? Get a new here for FREE!
>https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390
>_______________________________________________
>JBoss-user mailing list
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
>
>
>
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old
cell phone? Get a new here for FREE!
https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390
_______________________________________________
JBoss-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
