[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> You should instead download jboss 3.0.2, which has it included. I tried it, and got 
>it to work after about 5 minutes :-), it is very easy, just follow the instructions 
>in changenotes.


Hmmm.  Looked at the change notes, and have a request and a question:

SNIPPET 1st part:
<jboss>
   <!-- A custom container configuration for RMI/HTTP -->
   <container-configurations>
     <container-configuration extends="Standard Stateless SessionBean">
       <container-name>HTTP Stateless SessionBean</container-name>
       <home-invoker>jboss:service=invoker,type=http</home-invoker>
       <bean-invoker>jboss:service=invoker,type=http</bean-invoker>
     </container-configuration>
   </container-configurations>
...

1) In the next JBoss version, could this be in standardjboss.xml by 
default?  Seems pretty resusable.  That way people won't have to include 
it in their jboss.xml's.

SNIPPET 2nd part:
...
   <enterprise-beans>
     <session>
       <ejb-name>HelloWorldViaHTTP</ejb-name>
       <configuration-name>HTTP Stateless SessionBean</configuration-name>
       <jndi-name>helloworld/HelloHTTP</jndi-name>
     </session>
   </enterprise-beans>
</jboss>

2) What if I want to have two different invokers (rmi and http) for the 
*same* bean?  At first glance, it looks like I have to define the bean 
twice in the ejb-jar.xml (with different ejb-name's)?!  That doesn't 
work well in XDoclet when you get one xml-defined bean for every 
java-file bean.  I'd rather define it once in ejb-jar.xml, and twice in 
jboss.xml under different jndi-name's (I would then use xdoclet's 
mergeDir attribute to pull in the HTTP configuration).

Thanks,
David





-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old
cell phone?  Get a new here for FREE!
https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390
_______________________________________________
JBoss-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user

Reply via email to