On 2002.09.27 16:19:18 -0400 Curt Johnson wrote:
> A couple of quick questions...
> 
> Is the JMX ant task documented anywhere?
Only marginally in the package javadoc.

> Does it handle large files (> 20MB)?

Sure, it doesn't actually copy any files, it just sends the deploy command
to the deployer, which copies it at its convenience.
> Does it work with the farm service?

I haven't tried, but I think so.

david jencks
> 
> Thanks,
> Curt Johnson
> 
> David Jencks wrote:
> 
> >Well, I hope you try the jmx ant task also.  You can also (not
> automated)
> >just use jmx-console and the MainDeployer mbean to deploy stuff, just
> type
> >in the url and press the button.  Both jmx and jmx-console are not
> >dependent on the original source/location of the app remaining available
> >after deployment.
> >
> >david jencks
> >
> >On 2002.09.27 15:10:08 -0400 Jason Westra wrote:
> >
> >>Here are the results of my findings for HTTP deployment using the
> >>supplied
> >>URLDeploymentScanner and URLDirectoryScanner classes.
> >>
> >>URLDeploymentScanner
> >>--------------------
> >>- No scanning.  Must use a exact, comma-delimited list of URLs to the
> >>applications.
> >>- "hot" redeploy works
> >>- "hot" undeploy works, but only 50%.  After undeploy,
> >>URLDeploymentScanner
> >>tries to deploy each URL in the list, and if the app is gone, it logs
> >>errors
> >>continually.
> >>- No "hot" deploy of new apps.  You have to shutdown server, and change
> >>list
> >>of deployed applications, &restart.
> >>- Cannot use expanded applications (e.g., no default web apps).  Logs
> >>errors
> >>saying ZipException blah, blah...
> >>
> >>URLDirectoryScanner
> >>--------------------
> >>- No scanning. Must use a exact list of URLs to the applications.
> >>- "hot" redeploy works
> >>- No "hot" deploy of new apps.  You have to shutdown server, and change
> >>list
> >>of deployed applications, &restart.
> >>- "hot" undeploy works 100%.  If the app in the URL list does not
> exist,
> >>URLDirectoryScanner will not error out like URLDeploymentScanner.
> >>- Cannot use expanded applications, but logs no errors (different from
> >>URLDeploymentScanner)
> >>
> >>
> >>I have not tried the farm deployment option yet, nor the JMX Ant task.
> >>
> >>After experimenting so far, I think pointing multiple JBoss Servers to
> a
> >>shared network drive /deploy directory is a better option than using
> the
> >>HTTP deployment capability. Of course, assuming you have the option of
> >>using
> >>a shared drive to keep a single copy of your applications. Since the
> >>shared
> >>drive would be a single point of failure, this is a toughie to swallow
> >>too.
> >>
> >>Jason
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>-----Original Message-----
> >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David
> Jencks
> >>Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 10:19 AM
> >>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] deploying via HTTP URLs
> >>
> >>
> >>Warning, I haven't tried much of this, and may not be 100% accurate.
> >>
> >>On 2002.09.27 12:01:57 -0400 Jason Westra wrote:
> >>
> >>>Hi!
> >>>
> >>>I want to keep all deployed apps in a single location on our network
> >>>
> >>and
> >>
> >>>start up multiple (non-clustered) JBoss instances that deploy the apps
> >>>from
> >>>HTTP URLs.  I know this is *possible* with JBoss however...
> >>>
> >>>1. Is it recommended?
> >>>
> >>definitely
> >>
> >>>If not, why?
> >>>If so, what are some "gotchas" to look out for, tune, etc.?
> >>>
> >>>2. Does it work well with expanded web apps, or should I only use
> >>>archived
> >>>.wars?
> >>>
> >>I don't know, but I'd like to:-)
> >>
> >>>3. What affect does the URL deployment scanner time have on this type
> >>>
> >>of
> >>
> >>>deployment?
> >>>
> >>AFAIK the scanners really only work on local file systems.  If true,
> this
> >>means you will have to have your application repository on one of the
> >>jboss
> >>machines or deploy more explicitly.  I think you can either list the
> app
> >>urls explicitly in the scanner config or (what I'd probably do) write
> an
> >>ant script using the jmx task to explicitly deploy the apps.
> >>
> >>I think you can use the farm service without clustering to deploy to
> one
> >>jboss instance explicitly and have the deployments mirrored on the
> other
> >>servers automatically.
> >>
> >>>4. I have no need for session replication, fail-over, just
> >>>load-balancing.
> >>>Any recommendations on sticky IP routing software with Apache to
> ensure
> >>>requests are routed/load-balanced across the separate JBoss-Tomcat
> >>>servers?
> >>>
> >>I seem to recall Greg talking about writing some kind of load balancer
> >>for
> >>jetty so you wouldn't need apache or anything else, but I don't know
> >>whether this is finished.
> >>
> >>david jencks
> >>
> >>>Jason
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>-------------------------------------------------------
> >>>This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> >>>Welcome to geek heaven.
> >>>http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> >>>_______________________________________________
> >>>JBoss-user mailing list
> >>>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>-------------------------------------------------------
> >>This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> >>Welcome to geek heaven.
> >>http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> >>_______________________________________________
> >>JBoss-user mailing list
> >>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>-------------------------------------------------------
> >>This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> >>Welcome to geek heaven.
> >>http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> >>_______________________________________________
> >>JBoss-user mailing list
> >>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >-------------------------------------------------------
> >This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> >Welcome to geek heaven.
> >http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> >_______________________________________________
> >JBoss-user mailing list
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
> >
> >
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> Welcome to geek heaven.
> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> _______________________________________________
> JBoss-user mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
> 
> 


-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
JBoss-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user

Reply via email to