Darren Hartford wrote:
I don't mind you selling Gemstone as they are a JBoss partner. Gemstone should be significantly faster then almost any persistence code as it is using a fast persistent object cache under the covers so there is no object conversion. Also relationship navigation is super fast because they have live references in cache and I need to do a db call.Have been having similar issues, and my 'psuedo-hack' tests show similar results to Georg, so thank you Georg for pointing out that the database lookups are not the problem, but the object conversion piece.I don't wish to sell other products, but for a reference, has anyone seen a difference if they switch to another CMP Persistance engine such as Gemstone? I tried their eval on Jboss3.0.3, but I couldn't get it to work in my environment. Would be nice to know as a reference if solving
I plan on running Gerog's test soon as there is really no reason for the code to be any slower, but I am working on a new prefetch cache that can merge at the end of a tx.the entity-bean performance is clearly tied to CMP/Persistance, and also have available proven workarounds for people that have short timelines (yeah, I'm one of the many :-P). Please do not debate about commercial versus open-source methodology, just looking for solution to immediate business problems and methods to identify areas of improvements :-).
Agreed.Oh, and LIMIT/OFFSET's would be awesome!!!
-dain
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: Influence the future of Java(TM) technology. Join the Java Community Process(SM) (JCP(SM)) program now. http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?sunm0004en
_______________________________________________
JBoss-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
