Fredrik, here's a little background. We know the jars in application.xml are for application clients and that we should not put utility jars there - whether it is the perfect location for such information or not. I have made that point made and Craig just reiterated it. The prescribed solution is to use Class-Path because that construct already existed for downloadable jars - in my opinion that was not a good decision. That ground has been covered ad nauseam. Therein lies the problem: it fails on weblogic it fails on 3.0.2 of JBoss and Craig has just reported that it fails on 3.0.4 and 3.0.6. Since I have never seen a working example of Class-Path loads being effective I tend to discount your claim that is works. I am sure the application works but I am suspicious that it works because you have specified the utility jars that way. I would hasten to add it fails and has always failed in WebLogic 6.X service pack X. I will personally recommend you for guru-dom if you can tell me what Craig and I are doing wrong in setting this up but you have to admit tying shoe laces is more difficult that adding a jar path to Class-Path :)
----- Original Message ----- From: "Fredrik Lindgren" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, February 01, 2003 3:57 AM Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] EAR works in 2.4.10 but not in 3.0.6 > You should not put these jars in application.xml, that's for application > clients. You should however put the class path entries in the manifest > files of the WARs and ejb jars that depend on the common library jars. I > have not tested on 3.0.6, but I definately have it working in 3.0.4 > > /Fredrik Lindgren (not a JBoss guru, but hopefully helpful anyway) > > Rod Macpherson wrote: > > I vote they formalize the <java> module as a clean, intuitive and elegant > > mechanism for placing utility jars in EAR scope. > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Demyanovich, Craig - Apogent" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 6:47 PM > > Subject: RE: [JBoss-user] EAR works in 2.4.10 but not in 3.0.6 > > > > > > > >>3.0.4 did not work either. Like Rod, the EAR will work if I include all > >>library JARs in application.xml as <java> modules. According to the FAQ > >>that I cited earlier > > > > (http://www.jboss.org/faq.jsp#FAQ-BEANDEV-NORMALJARS), > > > >>though, the use of application.xml is NOT appropriate. However, I know of > >>no other way to create a single deployment unit for my application. I > >>appeal to you again, JBoss gurus, please explain!!! > >> > >>Thanks for your time, > >>Craig > >> > >> > >>------------------------------------------------------- > >>This SF.NET email is sponsored by: > >>SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! > >>http://www.vasoftware.com > >>_______________________________________________ > >>JBoss-user mailing list > >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.NET email is sponsored by: > > SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! > > http://www.vasoftware.com > > _______________________________________________ > > JBoss-user mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.NET email is sponsored by: > SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! > http://www.vasoftware.com > _______________________________________________ > JBoss-user mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com _______________________________________________ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
