On 2003.02.19 10:07 Rod Macpherson wrote:
> Assigned an RFE to you David:

Thanks.  There might be enough tracking going on now so this will be fairly
easy to implement. 
> 
> ================================
> Changed the min-max settings in oracle-service.xml from 0-0 to 17-17 and
> database access failed: stack traces. Using the JMX console to stop,
> change
> and restart works fine. Using the JMX console without a stoppage fails.
> However, once you successfully make that change you can apply additional
> changes without stoppign and restarting the service.
> ================================
> 
> IMO, absurd values should throw an exception or be quietly rejected: min
> >
> max. If you reduce the maximum below the number of currently checked out
> connections that setting would ideally be deferred. BTW, in weblogic they
> will re-use a connection without reserving it if it's part of a
> non-transactional pool. 

What exactly does this mean?  Several threads get handles to the same
physical connection  at the same time?  This seems like a bad idea to me:-)

thanks
david

Seems like a useful feature that JBoss could
> adopt.
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Jencks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 6:22 AM
> Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] Dynamic JCA pool size change problem
> 
> 
> > What happens if you stop the pool, change the limits, and start the
> pool?
> > You should actually stop//start the pool from
> > ServiceController.stop(ObjectName).
> >
> > Can you file a rfe on this and assign it to me?  I need to think about
> how
> > to do these hot changes.  Please describe how you would like it to
> work,
> > for instance what should happen if you reduce the pool size and more
> > connections than the new max are checked out.
> >
> > thanks
> > david jencks
> >
> > On 2003.02.19 08:17 Rod Macpherson wrote:
> > > Increased min-max pool connection limits from 0-10 to 17-17 on a hot
> > > system
> > > and generated stack traces on database access. As you might expect
> > > everything was fine after bouncing JBoss. No biggie but worth noting.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -------------------------------------------------------
> > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: SlickEdit Inc. Develop an edge.
> > > The most comprehensive and flexible code editor you can use.
> > > Code faster. C/C++, C#, Java, HTML, XML, many more. FREE 30-Day
> Trial.
> > > www.slickedit.com/sourceforge
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > JBoss-user mailing list
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > This SF.net email is sponsored by: SlickEdit Inc. Develop an edge.
> > The most comprehensive and flexible code editor you can use.
> > Code faster. C/C++, C#, Java, HTML, XML, many more. FREE 30-Day Trial.
> > www.slickedit.com/sourceforge
> > _______________________________________________
> > JBoss-user mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: SlickEdit Inc. Develop an edge.
> The most comprehensive and flexible code editor you can use.
> Code faster. C/C++, C#, Java, HTML, XML, many more. FREE 30-Day Trial.
> www.slickedit.com/sourceforge
> _______________________________________________
> JBoss-user mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
> 
> 


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SlickEdit Inc. Develop an edge.
The most comprehensive and flexible code editor you can use.
Code faster. C/C++, C#, Java, HTML, XML, many more. FREE 30-Day Trial.
www.slickedit.com/sourceforge
_______________________________________________
JBoss-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user

Reply via email to