Thursday, July 03, 2003, 7:18:56 PM, Bernhard Meyer-Willner wrote: MWB> Hi,
MWB> seems like JBossDO in JBoss 4.0 DR2 is now meant to be fully compatible to MWB> the JDO spec (apart from not being fully implemented yet)? Is this so? It is not yet fully compatible. The goal is to be. MWB> When MWB> I first heard rumors about JBossDO it sounded like it would be a proprietary MWB> POJO persistence mechanism. MWB> Now this is really great news for me that JBossDO seems to want to be a MWB> fully JDO compliant implementation. Just wanted some clarification on MWB> this... If this is so, keep up the great work since there really aren't many MWB> open source implemenations of JDO around, and those that are, are far from MWB> complete. MWB> The only limitation thus far seems to be that JBossDO only works inside of MWB> JBoss and not standalone?! Yes. MWB> Thanks in advance for clearing things up... Welcome, learn news from the source ;) alex MWB> Cheers, MWB> Bernie MWB> This e-mail and any attachment is for authorised use by the intended recipient(s) only. It may contain proprietary material, confidential information and/or be subject to legal privilege. It MWB> should not be copied, disclosed to, retained or used by, any other party. If you are not an intended recipient then please promptly delete this e-mail and any attachment and all copies and MWB> inform the sender. Thank you. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100006ave/direct;at.asp_061203_01/01 _______________________________________________ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
