-- xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Scott Stark Chief Technology Officer JBoss Group, LLC xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Brian Wallis wrote:
On Thu, 7 Aug 2003 11:34 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, I'd like to know as well. We will address this issues if it is so.
GPL licensed files #grep -R "under GPL" * jetty/src/main/org/jboss/jetty/JBossWebApplicationContext.java: * Distributable under GPL license. jetty/src/main/org/jboss/jetty/Jetty.java: * Distributable under GPL license. jetty/src/main/org/jboss/jetty/JettyMBean.java: * Distributable under GPL license. jetty/src/main/org/jboss/jetty/JettyService.java: * Distributable under GPL license. jetty/src/main/org/jboss/jetty/log/JBossLogSink.java: * Distributable under GPL license. jetty/src/main/org/jboss/jetty/security/JBossUserRealm.java: * Distributable under GPL license.
There also seems to be a reference to being GPL licensed in JNP.
./naming/src/docs/index.html:JNP is licensed through GPL (see www.gnu.org for details).
Should I be worrying at this point. Are these things really GPL licensed and if so what are the consequences to me as a developer using JBoss and also using the Jetty integration.
I am developing a commercial product and have very recently been asked by management to detail the licenses of the varous third party packages and tools that we are using. What should I tell them about JBoss? Is it all LGPL? If some is GPL doesn't that tend to make it all GPL?
brian wallis...
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 _______________________________________________ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
