You are right Andrew. Most of the time (not to say always), you change the
REMOTE CLIENTS to use HA-JNDI but you NEVER change the server settings in
itself.
Cheers,
Sacha
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Andrew May
> Sent: mardi, 2 septembre 2003 10:04
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] HA JNDI trouble
>
>
> I've only played around with clusters, so I could be wrong,
> but I think you need to access
> HA-JNDI directly on the port it's bound to. If the object
> cannot be found in HA-JNDI it
> will look in the local JNDI.
>
> From the clustering docs:
>
> "When a remote client does a lookup through HA-JNDI, HA-JNDI
> will delegate to the local
> JNDI Context when it cannot find the object within the global
> cluster-wide Context. So, a
> EJB home lookup through HA-JNDI, will always be delegated to
> the local JNDI instance."
>
> You should be able to tell whether HA-JNDI is correctly
> deployed from either the
> server.log or by looking in the JNDI console.
>
> When you say that you're using the same JNDI for all
> instances do you mean that you're
> setting the JNDI and/or HA-JNDI ports to be the same for
> seperate instances of JBoss? I'm
> not aware that you can do this - each JNDI and HA-JNDI should
> run on a seperate port. When
> you perform a remote lookup you can list multiple server
> instances like this:
>
> java.naming.provier.url=localhost:1100,localhost:1200,localhost:1300
>
> Hope that helps.
>
> -Andrew
>
> Stefan Groschupf wrote:
>
> > Hi Bax,
> >
> > nice to hear you! ;) I use such an pattern and it is generated by
> > Xdoclet. I use the BeanUtil classes.
> > They make an normal remote lookup. As i understand the
> documentation i
> > does not need an other lookup. Since the request will be
> forwarded to
> > the HA JNDI. Isn't it?
> >
> > Stefan
> >
> > Holger Baxmann wrote:
> >
> >> your setup reminds me on the Service Activator Pattern
> >>
> http://java.sun.com/blueprints/corej2eepatterns/Patterns/Servi
> ceActivator.html
> >> in conjunction with Session Facade and Service Locator for
> decoupling
> >> the lookup and the do-something stuff.
> >>
> >> It could be more easy to solve the clustering jndi problem if you
> >> have
> >> a facade between for 'hiding' the cluster to the 'client'
> --- but i
> >> could be totaly wrong here ...
> >>
> >> regards
> >>
> >> bax
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mon, 01 Sep 2003 10:12:23 +0200, Stefan Groschupf
> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Dear all,
> >>> I have massive trouble to get an simple cluster to run.
> It sounds in
> >>> all publications so easy, but something went wrong here.
> >>> I can run multiple instances on my machine via binding
> service. The
> >>> nodes are discovered and the farming deployment running well.
> >>> As you may be remember i have a set of node with my
> project A: It is
> >>> manually deployed on all nodes. I have my main
> application that has
> >>> an mdb that run my "job" queue.
> >>>
> >>> My problem is that it looks like i have no HA JNDI. To
> get something
> >>> running i setup my instances on my machine to use all the
> same jndi
> >>> of localhost. ;/
> >>>
> >>> But when i setup my nodes in the network to use on jndi on my main
> >>> machine it does of curse say that my project is already
> deployed. ;(
> >>> When i does not setup an jndi host as described in the clustering
> >>> documentation i get an Object no bound exception.
> >>>
> >>> My MDB:
> >>> TRExtractorRemote extractor = TRExtractorUtil.getHome().create();
> >>> ProcessedDocument document =
> >>> extractor.process(oneValue.getValueExternal());
> >>> (The Remote Object is generated by xdoclet)
> >>> Since my nodes are in a win network and the farming works
> i think the
> >>> multi casting working.
> >>>
> >>> Really guys i had try everything i had found in the net or in the
> >>> documentation and had tried it now 2 days and 2 nights,
> since i only
> >>> can play with the nodes over night. Someone has any idea where my
> >>> problem could be located?
> >>> I use jboss-3.2.2RC3_jetty-4.2.11.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks for giving me light!
> >>> Stefan
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> -------------------------------------------------------
> >>> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> >>> Welcome to geek heaven.
> >>> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> JBoss-user mailing list
> >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> > Welcome to geek heaven.
> > http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> > _______________________________________________
> > JBoss-user mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> Welcome to geek heaven.
> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> _______________________________________________
> JBoss-user mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/j> boss-user
>
>
>
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
JBoss-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
