I keep seeing posts like the one above that say that using Hypersonic for JMS JDBC persistence is not recommended. While I probably wouldn't argue with that point, I do not understand then why it is still, after all these years, included as a default in JBoss then.
Certainly there are other embeddable databases (like McKoi) that could be bundled as default in place of Hypersonic and would perhaps provide the features and robustness to be recommended for use especially for new users. I know the natural reaction to posts like this are to say "you can use whatever database you want" and yes that would be true, and I do. However, it seems that if you include a product in the default setup, you are indirectly, or perhaps even directly sanctioning its use. The bottom line is that if is is not recommended to use, then it should not be the default database in JBoss. Or at the very minimum, have a bullet point in the FAQ of this forum that states that Hypersonic should not be used and maybe even some points as to why that is the case. <a href="http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3824935#3824935";>View the original post</a> <a href="http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3824935>Reply to the post</a> ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click _______________________________________________ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
