I've always assumed that the memory is being consumed by the transaction manager.
I think that you will find that no actual database updates are performed until the the transaction is committed. It might be possible to use XA Transactions to get the database to assume this overhead - I did not investigate this before because I only just thought of it. Steve <a href="http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3826788#3826788";>View the original post</a> <a href="http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3826788>Reply to the post</a> ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click _______________________________________________ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
