"loubyansky" wrote : You can ORDER BY fields that are in SELECT, i.e. in your case
ORDER BY name. It's bug. There is no reason for this limitation. It's now fixed.
|
| Index: JDBCEJBQLCompiler.java
| | ===================================================================
| | RCS file:
/cvsroot/jboss/jboss/src/main/org/jboss/ejb/plugins/cmp/jdbc/JDBCEJBQLCompiler.java,v
| | retrieving revision 1.10.2.48
| | diff -r1.10.2.48 JDBCEJBQLCompiler.java
| | 1829,1832d1828
| | < else
| | < {
| | < throw new IllegalStateException("Unexpected select object: " +
selectObject);
| | < }
I had the same problem and downloaded 3.2.6RC1 and compiled it.
The problem remained.
Then I looked up JDBCEJBQLCompiler.java and found out the throw is still in there.
My problem was solved when I removed the lines with the throw and recompiled.
:-) Now it's working ...
I'm wondering, aren't the snapshots from CVS up to date?
regards
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3844896#3844896
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3844896
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media
100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33
Save 50% off Retail on Ink & Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift.
http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285
_______________________________________________
JBoss-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
