Can you exaplain then the following paragraph taken from the wiki anonymous wrote : NonSerializableFactory | | NO!!! | | This seems to be a common misunderstanding. The NonSerializableFactory takes objects that are not java.io.Serializable (and hence can't be bound into jndi by spec) and creates an indirection such that they can be bound. The object is still not serializable and in no way will it be available on a remote machine. The indirected object can be accessed inside the same JVM as where it is bound. | | Even if it was Serializable you would get a copy of the object not remote access, see above. | | Question: Why do people |
Is this information incorrect or does it relate to a different issue? View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3857836#3857836 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3857836 ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/ _______________________________________________ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
