Hi, i've done this before an uncommented this interceptor. Unfortunately is this interceptor not working correct. I've created an entry in the bug database with the result, that this interceptor was implemented in a dirty way and will be removed in future versions. So this is no solution for us.
Adrian Brock commented on JBAS-1626: ------------------------------------ I disagreed with this interceptor when it was first written but let it pass because it is not enabled by default. It was put there by the guy (who now works on ActriveMQ) that wrote the buggy ILs that couldn't detect that a client crashed. We no longer use those ILs. It is a big security concern (to me) that one client can hijack another client's subscription. It is certainly not spec compliant. If you are telling me it does not work, I am more likely to delete it than fix it. There are no tests for this behaviour in the testsuite. So unless you can provide a fix yourself, I am going to close this as "Won't Fix" and remove the interceptor from the codebase. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3872345#3872345 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3872345 ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by Demarc: A global provider of Threat Management Solutions. Download our HomeAdmin security software for free today! http://www.demarc.com/info/Sentarus/hamr30 _______________________________________________ JBoss-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
