Thanks Jason ! In fact doing a literal/wrapped is a very good workaround for us as wrapped/literal is what we want at the end for our attachments.
Only rpc/literal is possible for the endpoint. So when it will be possible to migrate to JBWS 2 with doc/lit endpoint, our clients will be already OK. And between rpc/literal & wrapped/literal, only the wsdl is different. But we use DII and SOAP Requests are the same ! All is wonderful in a wonderful world ! View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3875721#3875721 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3875721 ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tell us your software development plans! Take this survey and enter to win a one-year sub to SourceForge.net Plus IDC's 2005 look-ahead and a copy of this survey Click here to start! http://www.idcswdc.com/cgi-bin/survey?id=105hix _______________________________________________ JBoss-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
