"scrut" wrote : How does JBoss Portal compare to LifeRay and eXo? | The two latter portals seem a lot more mature and provide a lot of portlets already.
Mature how? We're not in the business of developing portlets. The goal of this project is to provide a scalable, flexible, and reliable portal framework, not bible and weather portlets. That being said, Novell is bringing roughly 35 portlets to the LGPL table. ;-) "scrut" wrote : | Why should someone use JBoss Portal instead when starting a new project? Because we back JBoss Portal with proven JBoss support services, and companies like Novell are knee-deep in assisting the portal effort with us. "scrut" wrote : | How is JBoss Portal different from the other systems? I've never gone thru and compared us feature for feature. You can see a complete feature list for portal here: http://docs.jboss.org/jbportal/v2.0RC/user-guide/en/html/features.html "scrut" wrote : | Here is my backdoor: what if I decided to use eXo or LifeRay for now and develop my own portlet - can I later deploy it with JBoss Portal as is and integrate it? I mean, all three claim that they are JSR168 compliant so in theory this might be a suitable backdoor. What is your opinion on that? If its spec compliant, then you can plug them in to eXo and move it to JBoss Portal. I don't know about portability in Liferay portal. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3877358#3877358 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3877358 ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by Oracle Space Sweepstakes Want to be the first software developer in space? Enter now for the Oracle Space Sweepstakes! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7393&alloc_id=16281&op=click _______________________________________________ JBoss-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
