tigerreef, I don't get your point about anonymous wrote : I don't see how this will work any other way with the deployment I want. Using the UCL is the way to avoid an 'ejbclient.jar', because the classes are found in the jar already. Just wipe it out.
If you absolutely wants to have an ejbclient.jar (and also use one) then it means that the classes are ALWAYS loaded by two different class loaders (as you found), and then you CAN'T possibly use any PASS BY REFERENCE optimisation, and you loose nearly all the advantages of colocating the WAR and the JAR inside the same EAR (except the ease of deploy) because you have to use the 'PASS BY VALUE' semantics (means serialize/deserialize). Cheers View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3877849#3877849 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3877849 ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by Oracle Space Sweepstakes Want to be the first software developer in space? Enter now for the Oracle Space Sweepstakes! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7393&alloc_id=16281&op=click _______________________________________________ JBoss-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
