Thanx a lot for responce. On first, must make an excuses for my english, it is 
very poor. I just trying to satisfy Your curiosity. :)
 
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote : You can use whatever you like, it is really up to 
you.
  | Fact is that we provide an integrated Tomcat version (meaning it integrates 
with clustering, deployment, security, etc.) and we make sure it is very well 
working with JBoss AS for each release we do. As we don't do it for Jetty (or 
any other servlet container), it is going to be your responsibility to make 
sure it works.
  | 
  | Now an interesting question would be: why do you prefer not to use Tomcat 
at all?
  | 
  | cheers,
  | sacha
  | 

Sounds good... :) But I really confused why JBoss prefers Tom. So, why I ahead 
the Tom? Because it:
a.) Has unexpected behaviour from release to release. Btw, it has 3 deployment 
scheme (4.x, 5.0.x, 5.5.x) at that 5.5.x and 4.x is not compliant at all. 
Moreover seems like deployment scheme is still under design, I think (why 
context.xml is unpacket to /conf?). And, can You see any Maven's plugin (should 
be addmitted I prefer it) that is working with each Tom? Please, let me know, 
if there is any. :) I think it has so knotty deployment that this task never be 
resolved?
b.) Its configuration is just a big joke, seems like Jakarta provides samples 
how the Tom can be configured (btw, try to configure the DataSource in 4.x and 
in 5.x, You'll be just a wonder) within each release.
c.) It is very huge as for just a Web container. The Jetty more small and 
transparent as for me. Btw, try to add the MBean to Tom, even with simplest 
lifecycle. Should note this task can spend more time that You can expect. :)
I can continue, but think there is more guys that can provide more arguments by 
more readable english.
P.S. What security You mean? JAAS? Web? Excuse me, I can't imaginate how JBoss 
can be depend from Tom's in this scope... Btw, Tom has the default JDBC Realm 
that is not always can be customized, since not always User model can be 
applied to suggested. I think it is poor design where You shouldn't provide 
just a simple SQL to fetch principal credentials.
P.S.S. About clustering. Should note that I haven't any experience in 
clustering , therefore can't talk about this. However, seems like it is not 
only Tom's feature. I think that there only HTTP session replication can be 
resolved... Do You agreed?
Thanx.

View the original post : 
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3880421#3880421

Reply to the post : 
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3880421


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: NEC IT Guy Games.  How far can you shotput
a projector? How fast can you ride your desk chair down the office luge track?
If you want to score the big prize, get to know the little guy.  
Play to win an NEC 61" plasma display: http://www.necitguy.com/?r=20
_______________________________________________
JBoss-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user

Reply via email to