Bela, one more clarification (I'm proceeding with investigations of what's going on).
We are testing a kind of failover solution. Thus, we kill JVM and start it again. If we will do so with server B, some of it's write locks could remain on server A. And after start of server A we will have an error I was talking about. We could release write lock on the node manually if we would be able to obtain this node. But the only way to obtain the node is to call get(Fqn) on TreeCache which will cause read lock setting attempt -> exception. So, the question is - can we get somehow the node without acquiring read lock on it? Regards, Eugene aka Skipy View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3892239#3892239 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3892239 ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf _______________________________________________ JBoss-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
