I want to share my thoughts and concerns about my initial evaluation of 3.1 alpha after developing against 3.0.x.
I think jBPM is fantastic product, it is light years ahead of OSWorkFlow (I get the feeling not many people are using it) and documented much better. This being said the ContextBuilder mechanism appears to complicate the ability to leverage 3rd party microcontainer (i'm using Spring and the alpha JbpmSessionFactory and Template classes). I would have rather seen a design that would have faciliated a pure IOC configuration, be it Spring or any other micro container. Over all I think jBPM rocks! The async feature is the main desire to upgrade versions and I really like the idea of using a non JMS messaging stack. I just desire jBPM to play well with my existing Spring service infastructure. Thanks -b View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3909642#3909642 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3909642 ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click _______________________________________________ JBoss-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
