I was afraid this was going to happen, but it took me all morning to create the test case.
Here is the scenario: [img]http://static.flickr.com/20/71523252_c5116f6d9a.jpg?v=0[/img] If I cause both parallel1 and parallel2 to not signal and signal their respective tokens later asynchronously, the join will not work because the threads don't know about each others state. ie: if parallel2b finishes first, its hit against the join is not registered so that when parallel1b hits the join, the join allows processing thru. I essentially need state refreshed in the join prior to allowing its logic to execute. How do I do this? Once I have this nailed, I am all done with testing... (help) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3911509#3911509 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3911509 ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click _______________________________________________ JBoss-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
