Yes, I agree, editing the definition on the fly might produce more problems than solutions esp. with ongoing process instances. Maybe it might be OK if your changes pertain only to additonal notifications, but not something that will change the flow of the process. I feel it might occur with very long processes, one that will probably take many months or years to complete. Business rules might change in the middle of the process.
It is one of the things that I want to avoid, I feel fine with versioning, however in real-case scenarios, I am anticipating that this will happen, especially if theres a flaw in the analysis. So I am thinking in the lines of probably rerouting the flow from the old version to the updated version. It might become very complicated, but it's something we have to be prepared for. Regards, Elmo View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3915083#3915083 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3915083 ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click _______________________________________________ JBoss-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
