It's my fault. The docs said one thing, the code another, and the defaulting 
was all set up to work well with an older draft of the EJB spec. I think other 
people have complained about this stuff and I just didn't understand what they 
were trying to say. Ugh.

So, I have rationalized this stuff as follows:

org.jboss.seam.core.init.managedPersistenceContexts em
  | em.persistenceUnitJndiName java:/EntityManagerFactories/testDatabase

Means look in "java:/EntityManagerFactories/testDatabase" for the EMF.


org.jboss.seam.core.init.managedPersistenceContexts testDatabase

Means look in "java:/testDatabase" for the EMF.

There is now no longer any support for just specifying the persistenceUnitName 
('cos of changes to the EJB3 spec).

The same thing has been done for managed Hibernate sessions.

In CVS.

View the original post : 
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3919000#3919000

Reply to the post : 
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3919000


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
JBoss-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user

Reply via email to