The bugs that prompted EH are years old. Let me know if you find any problems using the LRU Memory or indexed disk cache.
I'm working on additional tests for the distribution auxiliaries. Aaron > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2006 7:28 PM > To: JCS Users List > Subject: RE: JCS is almost twice as fast as EHCache at gets and puts > > Cool. > So is there some way to slow JCS down and actually make it work reliably > like EHCache? > > Perhaps spending some time writing automated tests for various > remote/lateral > cache configurations in "put" mode might be a good use of time. > > >-- Original Message -- > >Reply-To: "JCS Users List" <jcs-users@jakarta.apache.org> > >Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 16:15:45 -0800 (PST) > >From: Aaron Smuts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Subject: JCS is almost twice as fast as EHCache at gets and puts > >To: JCS Users List <jcs-users@jakarta.apache.org> > > > > > >http://jakarta.apache.org/jcs/JCSvsEHCache.html > > > >It is linked to in the faq. > > > >I put some of the test data here. I will be adding > >more information to this page, such as the relative > >sophistication of the JCS disk cache in comparison to > >eh. > > > >Aaron > > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- > >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > P > > ___________________________________________________________ > > Tiscali Broadband from 14.99 with free setup! > http://www.tiscali.co.uk/products/broadband/ > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
