No. We use maven, as should you, which requires that all dependencies be versioned. The convention is that the name includes the version. This is a very good convention. . . . . I can store multiple versions in my repository this way. Also, I don't have to look at the manifest to check the version.
Cheers, Aaron --- Tim Cronin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is it possible for the release to standardize the > jar name? > That is not put the version in it, your putting the > version in > The manifest all ready. That is if it's not a big > deal. > > Thanks > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
