Good. Sorry about the bug. We really need to formally deprecate the group code, if it isn't already.
Cheers, Aaron --- On Thu, 8/14/08, danparker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: danparker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: JDBC not working as expected > To: jcs-users@jakarta.apache.org > Date: Thursday, August 14, 2008, 2:45 PM > Aaron > > Your right it was the groups that caused the issue. As soon > as I took out > the groups the JDBCDiskCache started working. It was > basically an exception > whilst prepare statement the exception that was going > uncaught. It was > getting the element attributes which in this case were > group related and it > was expecting. > > * Case closed * > > Thanks for your help. We've been grappling with > failover for our production > environment. > > > > Aaron Smuts wrote: > > > > Hmmn. This might be a problem with groups and the > JDBC disk cache. I'll > > have to look into it. In any case, groups are > deprecated. I don't > > recommend using them. > > > > Aaron > > > > > > --- On Wed, 8/13/08, danparker > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> From: danparker > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> Subject: Re: JDBC not working as expected > >> To: jcs-users@jakarta.apache.org > >> Date: Wednesday, August 13, 2008, 10:02 PM > >> When I sent the tryBeforeInsert=true and > MaxPurgatory to 10 > >> and I exceed that > >> I get the following exception > >> > >> [8/14/08 0:50:21:693 EDT] 000000aa SystemErr R > >> Exception in thread > >> > "CacheEventQueue.QProcessor-InteractionControllerProcessCache" > >> java.lang.ClassCastException: > >> org.apache.jcs.engine.control.group.GroupAttrName > >> incompatible with > >> java.lang.String > >> [8/14/08 0:50:21:693 EDT] 000000aa SystemErr R > at > >> > org.apache.jcs.auxiliary.disk.jdbc.JDBCDiskCache.doesElementExist(JDBCDiskCache.java:392) > >> [8/14/08 0:50:21:693 EDT] 000000aa SystemErr R > at > >> > org.apache.jcs.auxiliary.disk.jdbc.JDBCDiskCache.doUpdate(JDBCDiskCache.java:244) > >> [8/14/08 0:50:21:693 EDT] 000000aa SystemErr R > at > >> > org.apache.jcs.auxiliary.disk.AbstractDiskCache$MyCacheListener.handlePut(AbstractDiskCache.java:603) > >> [8/14/08 0:50:21:693 EDT] 000000aa SystemErr R > at > >> > org.apache.jcs.engine.CacheEventQueue$PutEvent.doRun(CacheEventQueue.java:688) > >> [8/14/08 0:50:21:693 EDT] 000000aa SystemErr R > at > >> > org.apache.jcs.engine.CacheEventQueue$AbstractCacheEvent.run(CacheEventQueue.java:607) > >> [8/14/08 0:50:21:693 EDT] 000000aa SystemErr R > at > >> > org.apache.jcs.engine.CacheEventQueue$QProcessor.run(CacheEventQueue.java:575) > >> > >> Aaron Smuts wrote: > >> > > >> > Call get stats and see if the auxiliary is in > error. > >> Look for errors and > >> > warnings in the logs. > >> > > >> > Aaron > >> > > >> > > >> > --- On Tue, 8/12/08, danparker > >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > > >> >> From: danparker > >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> >> Subject: Re: JDBC not working as expected > >> >> To: jcs-users@jakarta.apache.org > >> >> Date: Tuesday, August 12, 2008, 1:52 PM > >> >> We are using version 1.3. > >> >> > >> >> We've changed DiskUsagePattern to > >> DiskUsagePatternName > >> >> but it had not > >> >> effect. Still nothing in the database. > >> >> > >> >> I'm building a workspace were I can > test this > >> >> independant of our load test > >> >> environment. > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> hanasakijiji wrote: > >> >> > > >> >> > What version of JCS? Are you seeing > this > >> bug? > >> >> > > >> >> > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCS-26?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12490995 > >> >> > > >> >> > >> > http://jakarta.apache.org/jcs/apidocs/org/apache/jcs/engine/behavior/ICompositeCacheAttributes.html > >> >> > *** is short not String - looks like > they > >> come from an > >> >> enum or public > >> >> > static short .... > >> >> > > >> >> > might try testBeforeInsert=true and > see if > >> any selects > >> >> are hitting the > >> >> > DB at all from the database logs. > >> >> > > >> >> > Let us know if you find the solution > and what > >> it is. > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 11:25 PM, > danparker > >> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> >> > wrote: > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> > >> > http://www.nabble.com/file/p18884628/cache_FDN_WithJDBC.ccf > >> >> >> cache_FDN_WithJDBC.ccf > >> >> >> > >> >> >> We've got three cache > regions we want > >> to have > >> >> the contents in memory(for > >> >> >> performance) and spooled out to > the > >> database so > >> >> that we can recover in a > >> >> >> failover situation. Attached is > the > >> configuration > >> >> file. We are seeing the > >> >> >> memory cache fill up but nothing > is going > >> into the > >> >> database. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> I've set the > DiskUsagePattern=update > >> and > >> >> IsSpool=True - is there > >> >> >> something > >> >> >> else I'm missing? > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> -- > >> >> >> View this message in context: > >> >> >> > >> >> > >> > http://www.nabble.com/JDBC-not-working-as-expected-tp18884628p18884628.html > >> >> >> Sent from the JCS - Users > mailing list > >> archive at > >> >> Nabble.com. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: > >> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: > >> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > >> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> >> > For additional commands, e-mail: > >> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> -- > >> >> View this message in context: > >> >> > >> > http://www.nabble.com/JDBC-not-working-as-expected-tp18884628p18952403.html > >> >> Sent from the JCS - Users mailing list > archive at > >> >> Nabble.com. > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: > >> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: > >> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > > >> > > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > For additional commands, e-mail: > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> -- > >> View this message in context: > >> > http://www.nabble.com/JDBC-not-working-as-expected-tp18884628p18975743.html > >> Sent from the JCS - Users mailing list archive at > >> Nabble.com. > >> > >> > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> For additional commands, e-mail: > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/JDBC-not-working-as-expected-tp18884628p18990314.html > Sent from the JCS - Users mailing list archive at > Nabble.com. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
